Difference between revisions of "Research papers/Current"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Updated for week of feb. 25) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Paper for Monday (2/25) - Presented by Tony Stassi''': | '''Paper for Monday (2/25) - Presented by Tony Stassi''': | ||
| + | |||
* Paul E. McKenney, Maged M. Michael, and Jonathan Walpole. [http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~walpole/papers/plos2007.pdf "Why The Grass May Not Be Greener On The Other Side: A Comparison of Locking vs. Transactional Memory"] | * Paul E. McKenney, Maged M. Michael, and Jonathan Walpole. [http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~walpole/papers/plos2007.pdf "Why The Grass May Not Be Greener On The Other Side: A Comparison of Locking vs. Transactional Memory"] | ||
'''Paper for Wednesday (2/27) - Presented by Mark Pfingstler''': | '''Paper for Wednesday (2/27) - Presented by Mark Pfingstler''': | ||
| − | * | + | |
| + | * John Regehr and Usit Duongsaa. [http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065910.1065918 Preventing interrupt overload]. In | ||
| + | ''Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems''. Chicago, IL. pp. 50--58. | ||
Revision as of 01:51, 26 February 2008
Paper for Monday (2/25) - Presented by Tony Stassi:
- Paul E. McKenney, Maged M. Michael, and Jonathan Walpole. "Why The Grass May Not Be Greener On The Other Side: A Comparison of Locking vs. Transactional Memory"
Paper for Wednesday (2/27) - Presented by Mark Pfingstler:
- John Regehr and Usit Duongsaa. Preventing interrupt overload. In
Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems. Chicago, IL. pp. 50--58.
